点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
这个春节，宝岛年味浓******
兔年到来，
宝岛台湾也迎来了
放宽口罩禁令后的首个春节，
不少民众返乡、出游；
旅游热门目的地旅馆、民宿订房火爆；
文博机构、宫观庙宇推出新春祈福活动；
灯会、花灯活动陆续开幕
……
快和小新一起感受
岛内红火的年节气氛吧！
过年就要吃吃喝喝
腊月十六，尾牙
闽台地区的民间传统节日
源于拜祭土地公的仪式
是春节庆祝活动的“先声”
公司常在这天宴请员工
图为尾牙宴。来源：台湾《工商时报》围炉，即吃年夜饭
除夕夜 一家人团圆
围坐在放有火锅的桌边聚餐
互相分享去年的经历
暖胃更暖心
图为围炉。来源：台湾《联合报》台湾年夜饭的菜品也讲究好寓意
鸡——富贵吉祥
鱼——年年有余
年糕——步步高升
乌鱼子——多子多福
菜头(白萝卜)——好彩头
乌鱼子白萝卜。来源：台湾《联合报》茄子、玉米、芭乐......
动物园里的小动物
也在大快朵颐
纷纷开启年夜饭“吃播”
高雄市寿山动物园的冠豪猪在除夕享受丰盛的一餐。来源：台湾《联合报》返乡热，旅游旺
2023年春运已启动
在这个团圆的节日
台北桃园机场迎来返乡过年的台胞
从1月19日到30日
累计客流量预估近100万人次
资料图：桃园机场内的旅客。中新社记者 陈小愿 摄还有不少民众选择旅游过节
位于屏东县的垦丁
凭借海滩海景和水上活动
成为一大热门目的地
饭店和民宿订房几近爆满
资料图：垦丁龙磐公园景区。中新社记者 杨程晨 摄传统习俗少不了
置办年货是春节前的一件大事
台北迪化年货大街热闹非凡
花枝丸、牛轧糖、鱿鱼丝应有尽有
人潮涌进 叫卖声四起
资料图：一年一度的台北迪化商圈年货大街吸引了众多市民前往游赏、采购，彩灯彩旗从街头挂到街尾。中新社记者 史元丰 摄走春
即大年初一的出行
许多民众会走进寺庙拜拜
祈求兔年一切顺利
不少寺庙今年也恢复了抢头香
资料图：台北龙山寺内，信众有的持一柱香祈福，有的双手合掌行礼。中新社记者 陈小愿 摄白天赏花
晚上观灯
多肉植物“月兔耳”、“兔子花”仙客来
兔子造型花灯、小提灯
陪伴大家度过一个美丽的春节
图为新北淡水天元宫的樱花。来源：“2023新北莳花好绽 浪漫樱花季”活动官网
2023南投灯会上，“粉红兔兔”从天空向大家拜年。来源：“2023南投灯会”官网新的一年，
盼两岸人员交流尽快恢复正常、
两岸同胞走近走亲！
(中新社微信公众号)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)